|
|
|
|
|
| |
Posted by on September 25, 2006, 6:18 am
Please log in for more thread options
hallo friends .. this is mahesh Kedari.
my final year project is smart wheelchair in which i m thinking to add
an artificial intelligence. This wheel chair will be a combination of
manual and machine control. In manual mode this wheelchair will be
controlled by the person sitting on wheelchair with the help of
joysticks while in automatic mode the person just has to give the voice
command which will be recognized by the wheelchair and it will take the
person to desired destination. this is the basic theme of the project.
i expect all you intelligent brains to put your views, tips and
implementation notes, doubts, problems regarding this project at this
news group..
thanking you..
Mahesh Kedari
|
|
Posted by on September 26, 2006, 9:49 am
Please log in for more thread options
I can see this being a big benefit to those with minimal mobility. Not
just those limited to voice command, but also to those with limited
muscle control. I know a gentleman who had a stroke, and can't talk.
His hand movements are also pretty limited, and a bit shaky. Such a
robot can interpret his hand controls on a joystick, and interpret them
while filtering out his unintended movements.
Some years ago spoke briefly with one lady who was researching ways for
severely handicapped children to be able to play. She was saying that
even a tiny bit of ability to control the world around them could be
very valuable. For your project, even if the wheelchair is of limited
use (such as inside the house), I imagine that having just a little
more control over their lives will be greatly appreciated.
Of course the biggest issue with making a device to assist a
handicapped person is that you are taking some responsibility for that
person's safety. Of course, your efforts are an academic exercise, so
you won't truly have that burden. But you should be working as though
that responsibility were there.
I think your biggest challenge is not getting the chair to move to a
command. Rather, it is being absolutely sure the chair cannot go down a
step or flight of stairs. Bumping into things is less of a safety
issue, but you certainly don't want the person to feel like a bull in a
china shop.
If the chair is restricted to being inside a controlled environment
(such as an individual's house or a nursing home) then you can take
advantage of that situation. The person will probably have only a few
standard places where they go, and common paths they will take between
those places. E.g. the Living Room, The TV, By the Window, At the
computer desk.
Then, the user only has to indicate their intended destination, and the
chair's task it to follow a pre-programmed route. If the person wants
to go somewhere off those routes, then the interface needs to be more
complicated to allow the person time to make sure they are not knocking
stuff over.
On the pre-programmed routes the user can verbally stop the chair
themselves, though it should be kept clear most of the time. But I
think the chair should still monitor that the path is clear, especially
if it needs to back up at any time.
Knowing the difficulty robots have with obstacle avoidance, I would
work to put as much responsibility for avoiding obstacles on the user
as you can. Perhaps a video camera to view what is behind them so they
can back up with confidence. When moving forward, a laser might be
able to scan out the planned path, so the user can see if the path is
what they really want to do, and that the path is clear.
Joe Dunfee
|
|
Posted by D. Jay Newman on September 30, 2006, 12:04 am
Please log in for more thread options cadcoke3@yahoo.com wrote:
> On the pre-programmed routes the user can verbally stop the chair
> themselves, though it should be kept clear most of the time. But I
> think the chair should still monitor that the path is clear, especially
> if it needs to back up at any time.
Yes; the chair should have enough senses for basic obsticle avoidance.
>
> Knowing the difficulty robots have with obstacle avoidance, I would
> work to put as much responsibility for avoiding obstacles on the user
> as you can. Perhaps a video camera to view what is behind them so they
The trouble with that is that many handicapped individuals don't have
fast reflexes. The wheelchair should be able to avoid obsticles on its
own. However, the obsticle avoidance routines should be written knowing
that there is a rider.
--
D. Jay Newman ! Author of:
jay@sprucegrove.com ! _Linux Robotics: Programming Smarter Robots_
http://enerd.ws/robots/ ! "Heros aren't born, they're cornered."
|
|
Posted by Christopher on September 28, 2006, 4:02 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On 25 Sep 2006 03:18:57 -0700, maheshbest@gmail.com wrote:
>hallo friends .. this is mahesh Kedari.
>my final year project is smart wheelchair in which i m thinking to add
>an artificial intelligence. This wheel chair will be a combination of
>manual and machine control. In manual mode this wheelchair will be
>controlled by the person sitting on wheelchair with the help of
>joysticks while in automatic mode the person just has to give the voice
>
>command which will be recognized by the wheelchair and it will take the
>
>person to desired destination. this is the basic theme of the project.
>i expect all you intelligent brains to put your views, tips and
>implementation notes, doubts, problems regarding this project at this
>news group..
Hello Mahesh Kedari,
Try this link to more groups with focus on robotics and AI
http://groups.yahoo.com/search?query=robotics
I wish you success and hope you have the time to develop the many
ideas you'll gather.
* * *
Christopher
Temecula CA.USA
http://www.oldtemecula.com
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | don't miss a discipline | November 10, 2007, 2:47 pm |
| Re: Miss Manners | December 14, 2007, 4:42 pm |
| miss saves the known trap | August 19, 2007, 7:03 pm |
| afternoon prior to miss endures stealthily | August 16, 2007, 4:02 am |
| Re: Miss Catalina Spanks Her Naughty Servant | December 21, 2007, 5:47 pm |
| Re: Just undertaking among a premium in respect of the molecule is too soft for Isabelle to miss it. | December 13, 2007, 3:51 pm |
| sometimes Allahdad will gaze the significance, and if Najem differently transmits it too, the ointment will miss away from the widespread pier | November 10, 2007, 12:58 pm |
| heeeeeeeeelp! pls read | March 1, 2006, 5:38 pm |
| Re: Books to read before you die | December 13, 2007, 3:54 pm |
| Wheelchair Motors | August 10, 2007, 11:09 am |
|
|
|
XML site map
> themselves, though it should be kept clear most of the time. But I
> think the chair should still monitor that the path is clear, especially
> if it needs to back up at any time.