|
|
|
|
|
| |
Posted by Patrick Demets on July 4, 2007, 12:31 am
Please log in for more thread options
I'm not sure if RTL is still active, but here goes (please point me to
another list if RTL is no loger active):
I know the subject of sorting, organizing, and storing Lego has been
discussed in numerous threads, but I haven't seen anything that talks about
these issues as they specifically relate to kids and reducing Lego chaos.
We have a modest collection of Lego sets (no repeats -- somewhere around 25
sets, some large, some smaller), and managing their use with and by our kids
is an unending, time-consuming challenge. In particular, pieces get strewn
about the house (within reach of very small hands and mouths), others are
misplaced or lost (perhaps to the vacuum cleaner or down the heating ducts
or brought to school never to return), and others are broken. I find myself
constantly policing, managing, and doing inventory of Lego.
Perhaps our children are too young to play with Lego (but I doubt it; ages
9,7,5, not counting the newborn). I just hate to think that some of our
sets might no longer be complete, and therefore not buildable in a strict
sense. I know I'd be upset if I'd begin a model only to realize halfway
through it that pieces are missing (especially when it's a cool Technic). I
grew up playing Meccano, and I would store my parts in their original box,
assemble complex models with many parts, play and experiment for a while,
and then return all parts in their original box. Perhaps I'm trying to be
too strict with the Lego, and I need to lighten up (what's a few missing
pieces, really?)
On this note, I've found that organizing and storing Lego by sets works best
in our house (keeping the above comments in mind). I keep each set in its
own bag, with building instruction booklet(s) and a list of all pieces for
that set, noting any that are missing -- and every single one of our sets
has missing pieces. Web resources and a colour printer have been wonderful
in this respect. Each child may take out one set at a time (two if I'm
feeling particularly type-B that day!) I encourage my kids to count the
pieces at the beginning to ensure they're getting all the required pieces
(or as many as possible, or at least that they're OK with building with
missing pieces). I also encourage them to count the pieces when they're
done -- but this never actually happens, partly because they can't be
bothered to do it, and partly because the projects wind up morphing and
mating with others, including the Lego tub that's kept around for free play.
The result is a handful of sets (or parts of sets) scattered throughout the
house, and me having to do inventory every so often, and acting like the
Lego dictator/police/librarian (and *no*, I don't enjoy that).
Organizing Lego by sets does have its drawbacks: the creative juices don't
flow as well when limited to a set, as opposed to sitting in front of a wall
of storage bins and letting your imagination soar (we're nowhere near having
that many Lego -- yet). On the other hand, organizing by sets simplifies
the set-by-set inventory. However, I do sort pieces by type and size when I
do inventory and when redistributing parts in their respective sets.
If you have any suggestions on how to manage Lego with kids -- sorting,
storing, use, misuse, preventing or dealing with loss of pieces, etc. -- I'd
love to hear them. Yes, I know, the first suggestion (one I've already
worked out) is to be less anal retentive, to chill out, and let kids be kids
(not as easy as it sounds, believe you me! Especially when the broken/lost
piece is an irreplaceable part).
I apologize for the wordiness, but it's been on my mind for a while now,
with no workable solution in sight, and I just had to get it out there.
Cheers, and your suggestions and comments are much appreciated,
Patrick (who is oh-so-very type-A)
|
|
Posted by Anders Isaksson on July 4, 2007, 6:16 am
Please log in for more thread options
Patrick Demets wrote:
> I'm not sure if RTL is still active, but here goes (please point me to
> another list if RTL is no loger active):
www.lugnet.com is the place where most of RTL went. There are also other
special forums on the net for ClassicCastle, Bionicles etc. just google for
them.
> I know the subject of sorting, organizing, and storing Lego has been
> discussed in numerous threads, but I haven't seen anything that talks
> about these issues as they specifically relate to kids and reducing
> Lego chaos.
In our home it goes/went like this (the kids are 20, 17 and 8 now, so it's
not a big problem):
In general, Lego is only allowed in one room of the house (the 'hobby'
room). When the kids got new sets, they of course built them in their own
room, displayed the model on the shelfs there, but sooner or later the parts
wander down to the Lego room, and are not kept together as a set any more.
All instructions are kept in plastic pockets and put in a binder.
Some sets are kept intact 'forever', my Technic 8880 SuperCar and Space
Shuttle, the Milennium Falcon are some examples.
Some parts may have gone missing, but there is very seldom only one source
for a certain part, so the models are still buildable (although not all at
once). If a critical, single source, part had gone missing, I suppose I
would have tried to find a replacement at www.bricklink.com but it hasn't
happened yet.
We have a lot of bins for sorting the different parts (mainly by shape,
seldom by color). Sorting is mostly my concern (our collection isn't so
large as to make it into a chore, instead I find it quite relaxing to sort),
although all three kids have learned to mostly put parts back in the bin
where they should be.
I don't think there exists a 'one solution for all people', but this is how
it has worked out for us.
--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD: http://web.telia.com/~u16122508/proglego.htm
Gallery: http://web.telia.com/~u16122508/gallery/index.htm
|
|
Posted by Bob Fay on July 4, 2007, 5:47 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> I'm not sure if RTL is still active, but here goes (please point me to
> another list if RTL is no loger active):
SNIP A LOT
I really feel sorry for the kids. Lego is fun! Lego collecting is not fun.
Play well!
Bob
-
http://www.ozbricks.com/bobfay
|
|
Posted by Ken Rice on July 4, 2007, 6:26 pm
Please log in for more thread options says...
>
>I'm not sure if RTL is still active, but here goes (please point me to
>another list if RTL is no loger active):
>
>I know the subject of sorting, organizing, and storing Lego has been
>discussed in numerous threads, but I haven't seen anything that talks about
>these issues as they specifically relate to kids and reducing Lego chaos.
>We have a modest collection of Lego sets (no repeats -- somewhere around 25
>sets, some large, some smaller), and managing their use with and by our kids
>is an unending, time-consuming challenge. In particular, pieces get strewn
>about the house (within reach of very small hands and mouths), others are
>misplaced or lost (perhaps to the vacuum cleaner or down the heating ducts
>or brought to school never to return), and others are broken. I find myself
>constantly policing, managing, and doing inventory of Lego.
>
>Perhaps our children are too young to play with Lego (but I doubt it; ages
>9,7,5, not counting the newborn). I just hate to think that some of our
>sets might no longer be complete, and therefore not buildable in a strict
>sense. I know I'd be upset if I'd begin a model only to realize halfway
>through it that pieces are missing (especially when it's a cool Technic). I
>grew up playing Meccano, and I would store my parts in their original box,
>assemble complex models with many parts, play and experiment for a while,
>and then return all parts in their original box. Perhaps I'm trying to be
>too strict with the Lego, and I need to lighten up (what's a few missing
>pieces, really?)
>
>On this note, I've found that organizing and storing Lego by sets works best
>in our house (keeping the above comments in mind). I keep each set in its
>own bag, with building instruction booklet(s) and a list of all pieces for
>that set, noting any that are missing -- and every single one of our sets
>has missing pieces. Web resources and a colour printer have been wonderful
>in this respect. Each child may take out one set at a time (two if I'm
>feeling particularly type-B that day!) I encourage my kids to count the
>pieces at the beginning to ensure they're getting all the required pieces
>(or as many as possible, or at least that they're OK with building with
>missing pieces). I also encourage them to count the pieces when they're
>done -- but this never actually happens, partly because they can't be
>bothered to do it, and partly because the projects wind up morphing and
>mating with others, including the Lego tub that's kept around for free play.
>The result is a handful of sets (or parts of sets) scattered throughout the
>house, and me having to do inventory every so often, and acting like the
>Lego dictator/police/librarian (and *no*, I don't enjoy that).
>
>Organizing Lego by sets does have its drawbacks: the creative juices don't
>flow as well when limited to a set, as opposed to sitting in front of a wall
>of storage bins and letting your imagination soar (we're nowhere near having
>that many Lego -- yet). On the other hand, organizing by sets simplifies
>the set-by-set inventory. However, I do sort pieces by type and size when I
>do inventory and when redistributing parts in their respective sets.
>
>If you have any suggestions on how to manage Lego with kids -- sorting,
>storing, use, misuse, preventing or dealing with loss of pieces, etc. -- I'd
>love to hear them. Yes, I know, the first suggestion (one I've already
>worked out) is to be less anal retentive, to chill out, and let kids be kids
>(not as easy as it sounds, believe you me! Especially when the broken/lost
>piece is an irreplaceable part).
>
>I apologize for the wordiness, but it's been on my mind for a while now,
>with no workable solution in sight, and I just had to get it out there.
>
>Cheers, and your suggestions and comments are much appreciated,
>
>Patrick (who is oh-so-very type-A)
>
The first question that pops to mind is: Whose sets are they? If they are your
sets, then you can decide how, when and where your kids can play with they, how
they are stored, etc. If they are your kids' sets, let them decide how, when
and where to play with them. However, avoidance of chaos is also an issue with
kids and their playthings, so the idea of keeping everything in a single area
is a good one. As for storing and sorting the parts, let the kids decide that.
Let them be creative in their play and in the storage of the sets.
You could have two collections for Lego sets. One that you kept according to
your tastes and guidelines, and one according to the kid's tastes and
guidelines. You could even let each kid have their own special collection of
sets that they didn't have to share with the others and could keep on their
own terms.
Remember that this is not a black and white issue. There are 256 shades of
gray.
--
Ken Rice -=:=- kennrice (AT) erols (DOT) com
http://users.erols.com/kennrice - Lego Compatible Flex Track,
Civil War Round Table of DC & Concentration Camp made of Lego bricks
http://members.tripod.com/~kennrice
Maps of Ultima 7 Parts 1 & 2, Prophecy of the Shadow, Savage Empire,
Crusaders of Dark Savant & Others.
|
|
Posted by Gene S. Berkowitz on July 4, 2007, 11:23 pm
Please log in for more thread options notquiteclapton@HATESPAMshaw.ca says...
> I'm not sure if RTL is still active, but here goes (please point me to
> another list if RTL is no loger active):
>
> I know the subject of sorting, organizing, and storing Lego has been
> discussed in numerous threads, but I haven't seen anything that talks about
> these issues as they specifically relate to kids and reducing Lego chaos.
> We have a modest collection of Lego sets (no repeats -- somewhere around 25
> sets, some large, some smaller), and managing their use with and by our kids
> is an unending, time-consuming challenge. In particular, pieces get strewn
> about the house (within reach of very small hands and mouths), others are
> misplaced or lost (perhaps to the vacuum cleaner or down the heating ducts
> or brought to school never to return), and others are broken. I find myself
> constantly policing, managing, and doing inventory of Lego.
>
> Perhaps our children are too young to play with Lego (but I doubt it; ages
> 9,7,5, not counting the newborn). I just hate to think that some of our
> sets might no longer be complete, and therefore not buildable in a strict
> sense. I know I'd be upset if I'd begin a model only to realize halfway
> through it that pieces are missing (especially when it's a cool Technic). I
> grew up playing Meccano, and I would store my parts in their original box,
> assemble complex models with many parts, play and experiment for a while,
> and then return all parts in their original box. Perhaps I'm trying to be
> too strict with the Lego, and I need to lighten up (what's a few missing
> pieces, really?)
>
> On this note, I've found that organizing and storing Lego by sets works best
> in our house (keeping the above comments in mind). I keep each set in its
> own bag, with building instruction booklet(s) and a list of all pieces for
> that set, noting any that are missing -- and every single one of our sets
> has missing pieces. Web resources and a colour printer have been wonderful
> in this respect. Each child may take out one set at a time (two if I'm
> feeling particularly type-B that day!) I encourage my kids to count the
> pieces at the beginning to ensure they're getting all the required pieces
> (or as many as possible, or at least that they're OK with building with
> missing pieces). I also encourage them to count the pieces when they're
> done -- but this never actually happens, partly because they can't be
> bothered to do it, and partly because the projects wind up morphing and
> mating with others, including the Lego tub that's kept around for free play.
> The result is a handful of sets (or parts of sets) scattered throughout the
> house, and me having to do inventory every so often, and acting like the
> Lego dictator/police/librarian (and *no*, I don't enjoy that).
>
> Organizing Lego by sets does have its drawbacks: the creative juices don't
> flow as well when limited to a set, as opposed to sitting in front of a wall
> of storage bins and letting your imagination soar (we're nowhere near having
> that many Lego -- yet). On the other hand, organizing by sets simplifies
> the set-by-set inventory. However, I do sort pieces by type and size when I
> do inventory and when redistributing parts in their respective sets.
>
> If you have any suggestions on how to manage Lego with kids -- sorting,
> storing, use, misuse, preventing or dealing with loss of pieces, etc. -- I'd
> love to hear them. Yes, I know, the first suggestion (one I've already
> worked out) is to be less anal retentive, to chill out, and let kids be kids
> (not as easy as it sounds, believe you me! Especially when the broken/lost
> piece is an irreplaceable part).
>
> I apologize for the wordiness, but it's been on my mind for a while now,
> with no workable solution in sight, and I just had to get it out there.
>
> Cheers, and your suggestions and comments are much appreciated,
>
> Patrick (who is oh-so-very type-A)
We've taken the approach that after the set is built once, it's fair
game to become something else.
For example, my son has several of the Lego 9V trains, and about 25' of
track. We had fun building the sets, but once that's done, you have a
train set, and as most train hobbyists will tell you, there's not much
fun in having a train layout "finished". The trains rapidly got
stripped apart, and made into new models, most of which are a lot more
rugged and less top-heavy than the Lego originals. We have lots of
wrecks, which are REALLY fun.
We now view sets as collections of unusual pieces, rather than an end
unto themselves.
--Gene
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | "LEGO mindstorm is not produced anymore", LEGO public relations officer | September 29, 2005, 2:40 am |
| 38 vintage lego sets (mostly space lego) for sale in Seattle area | July 2, 2007, 9:14 pm |
| opinion on Large lot of Lego sensors, NXT stuff Ultrasonik sensor, Train, Electronic Lego pieces, mini motor | July 19, 2007, 9:17 pm |
| FA: Brand-New Lego Robotics Discovery Set (Lego 9735) | November 13, 2005, 3:43 pm |
| Exclusive: The Lego Minifig Timeline [LEGO] (Gizmodo) | October 30, 2008, 4:10 am |
| Lego Star Wars Death Star Diorama Now Available—Rebel Alliance and Free Time Beware! [Lego] (Gizmodo) | September 13, 2008, 1:09 pm |
| Help: Lego Set! | January 25, 2007, 6:25 am |
| Lego to sell | July 31, 2005, 9:56 am |
| LEGO 6090 | August 7, 2005, 4:54 pm |
| LEGO kupujem | August 26, 2005, 5:41 am |
|
|
|
XML site map
> another list if RTL is no loger active):