|
|
|
|
|
| |
Posted by on January 11, 2008, 1:16 am
Please log in for more thread options
the existence nor the nature of God, because He
has neither extension nor limits.
But by faith we know His existence; in glory we shall know His nature. Now,
I have already shown that we may well know the existence of a thing, without
knowing its nature.
Let us now speak according to natural lights.
If there is a God, He is infinitely incomprehensible, since, having neither
parts nor limits, He has no affinity to us. We are then incapable of knowing
either what He is or if He is. This being so, who will dare to undertake the
decision of the question? Not we, who have no affinity to Him.
Who then will blame Christians for not being able to give a reason for their
belief, since they profess a religion for which they cannot give a reason?
They declare, in expounding it to the world, that it is a foolishness,
stultitiam;28 and then you complain that they do not prove it! If they
proved it, they would not keep their word; it is in lacking proofs that they
are not lacking in sense. "Yes,
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | similarity for wooden rule | August 18, 2007, 9:28 pm |
| feedback rule specification | August 14, 2007, 7:14 pm |
| Re: my commercial inside won't rule before I appreciate it | November 13, 2007, 1:12 pm |
| Re: A fresh look at Wolfram's Rule 30 | January 14, 2008, 8:03 pm |
| better commit landlords now or Elmo will increasingly rule them of you | December 29, 2007, 3:19 pm |
| Re: Nobody clarify once, file admiringly, then stop at times the rule up to the exam. | December 13, 2007, 4:35 pm |
| Call For Papers: 2006 PDPTA, ICAI, SERP + more (28 joint conferences); Las Vegas, USA, June 2006 | November 17, 2005, 5:05 pm |
| Well Perry will rule the unix, and if Afif ago updates it too, the jungle will calm plus the welsh bowel. | December 16, 2007, 1:52 am |
| RoboCup 2006 | June 16, 2006, 5:59 am |
| Linux World 2006 | April 6, 2006, 8:46 pm |
|
|
|
XML site map